Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Similarities between patterns were calculated by using Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient.
Similar(59)
The percentage similarity between patterns was calculated using the Dice correlation coefficient [ 19].
The percentage similarity between patterns was calculated using the Dice correlation coefficient.
After normalization and background subtraction, the levels of genetic similarity between AFLP patterns were calculated with the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r).
The percentage similarities/differences between FAFLP patterns were calculated using the Dice correlation coefficient.
Similarities between RFLP patterns were calculated using the Dice coefficient, and the dendrogram was produced using an unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic averages algorithm.
Pair wise similarities between the XbaI pulsed-field patterns were calculated by the DICE's similarity coefficient.
Correlations between deviations of injured/non-injured side SEMG ratios and specific altered movement patterns were calculated.
Peak patterns were calculated using MegaBACE Geneprofiler software v. 1.0 (GE Healthcare).
Activity patterns were calculated for each collared animal by estimating the average speed obtained from the distance between two consecutive GPS locations.
The correlation between band patterns was calculated with dice coefficient.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com