Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
For reactions R5PI and RUPE, the absolute difference between our current model predictions and the values reported by Goldberg et al. (25) is within a reasonable margin, 0.21 and 0.07 kJ/mol, respectively.
Similar(59)
We designed 8 new RPS17B intron mutants for the purpose of testing our current model of correlation between intronic pre-mRNA secondary structure and splicing efficiency.
Our current model does not distinguish between these processes and summarizes their effects through the w matrices.
Also, there are noticeable discrepancies between our current and previous models in other regions of the world, for example, in the Amazon basin which accommodates less conductance in our model.
This enhanced biological realism is a key distinguishing feature between this current model and previously published models including our own previous simulation model.
Figure 13 Comparison of height predictions between the current model (25 stands) shown in Figure 4 and that of Herbert et al. (2 stands).
Figure 15 Comparison of volume predictions between the current model (25 stands) shown in Figure 10 and that of Herbert et al. (2 stands).
Figure 14 Comparison of basal area predictions between the current model (25 stands) shown in Figure 7 and those of Herbert et al. (2 stands) and Chikumbo and Steward (13 stands).
In addition to better agreement between the current model and experimental data in comparison to the extended Mooney-Rivlin hyper-viscoelastic model, a stable material behavior was predicted for pure shear and balance biaxial deformation modes.
Comparison between the current model and results obtained with full radiosity showed that significant errors can be introduced by improper modeling of blind specular components for almost all profile angles and slat angles.
The comparison between the current model predicted characteristic times of boron combustion and the measured data in the current study and other published experimental data in the literature is generally in good agreement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com