Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Edible Sounds allows us to query what we eat in a very unconventional format; showing us a further dissimilarity between nonprocessed and processed foods.
Similar(59)
And process repeated!
Based on the evidence, the EFSA Panel concluded that foods, with at least 3 g/d of β-glucans from oats, oat bran, barley, and barley bran, or with mixtures of nonprocessed or minimally processed β-glucans, can reduce blood cholesterol in adults with normal or mildly elevated cholesterol levels.
Within the processed pseudogene category, only 67 cases (human and mouse combined) have parental gene length >1000 amino acids (aa), whereas 421 in the case of nonprocessed category, suggesting that longer protein coding genes are ~6 times more likely to produce nonprocessed pseudogenes than processed ones.
Protein-coding genes longer than 3000 bp are 6 times more likely to produce nonprocessed pseudogenes than processed ones.
Parental genes encoding for proteins longer than 1000 aa are 6 times more likely to produce nonprocessed pseudogenes than processed ones.
We next considered the modifying effect of frequency of intake of two different types of marinades (BBQ sauce and shoyu) on the association between nonprocessed red meat and nonprocessed poultry with CRC risk.
Nisbett and Wilson distinguish between content and process.
We observed evidence of effect modification of the association between nonprocessed red meat and CRC risk by frequency of use of shoyu marinade.
The total number of sequences in each category is as follows: human nonprocessed pseudogenes (1494), human processed pseudogenes (2858), human proteins (47550) and human protein-coding genes (23944); mouse nonprocessed pseudogenes (1753), mouse processed pseudogenes (2393), mouse proteins (31535) and mouse protein-coding genes (24461).
However, to our knowledge, no clinical comparison has been done between processed BMA and nonprocessed BMA, which will be of high interest.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com