Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
With 2,096 training bulls, the accuracy due to LD is always higher for BayesB than for G-BLUP, where the largest difference of 0.2 and 0.12 between methods was obtained for milk and protein yield, respectively, and smallest for somatic cell score.
Similar(59)
For all mixes, the parameters were analyzed by the work-of-fracture method (WFM) and by the size effect method (SEM) and consequently a correlation between these methods was obtained which is used to calibrate cracking numerical models.
Very good agreement (within 5%) between the two methods was obtained.
An excellent agreement between the two methods was obtained, confirming the accuracy and precision of the SED-sensors.
A 100% concordance rate between the two methods was obtained.
Good agreement between weight loss and polarization methods was obtained.
In the present study, one hundred percent concordance between the phenotypic and molecular methods was obtained for a collection of clinically important yeast isolates containing representative numbers of strains (≥ 40 strains) as follows: C. albicans (n = 76), C. tropicalis (n = 40) and C. glabrata (n = 47) (Additional file 2: Table S2).
The statistical differences between both methods were obtained by analyzing 16 different plasma samples (pooled) and paired t-test was used for comparison between the mean values.
Excellent agreement between the two methods are obtained.
A good correlation between the three methods is obtained, providing evidence that our formulation accurately predicts the behavior of rotational energy harvesters.
No differences between these two digestion methods were obtained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com