Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
However, with a greater number of monomer substitutions, a more clear separation in accuracy between methods was observed.
A general disagreement between methods was observed.
Similar(58)
Large differences between methods are observed, for instance the RF model in terms of MCC is performing around the average, but both RF and RF_PCM underperform in terms of early enrichment (BEDROC 0.54 ± 0.03 and 0.56 ± 0.04 vs. the mean 0.66 ± 0.03).
Considerable effort was invested in evaluating and comparing different approaches for RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification, and substantial differences between methods were observed (data not shown).
This study showed that, although the interpretation of results was not affected, differences between methods were observed.
No correlation nor concordance between both methods was observed.
No correlation between both methods was observed (r = 0.170, p = 0.20).
The obtained results were compared with those obtained by ICP OES and no statistical difference between the methods was observed.
On average a difference of 1.8 log units between both methods was observed for the predicted log Kaw values.
The main difference between both methods was observed in the dispersion of the mechanical response of the asphalt course.
Good agreement between both methods was observed although the levels for free chlorine measured by the optical sensor are systematically lower than the readings obtained from the DPD method.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com