Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Nevertheless, the observed difference in EELV between methods at high PEEP may be related to the fact that the WI-WO method measures a functional EELV, while CT measures anatomical EELV.
Similar(59)
Fourteen studies used quantitative methods at high standard.
Commonality between methods at the level of differential expression was much more limited, with little overlap between proteomic methods.
[ 40], generated iPS cells using this method at high efficiency.
The range of LE between ethnic groups was larger for the SIR method which included health information than for the GWM method which did not, and appeared to be mainly due to differences between the methods at the highest LE rather than the lowest LE.
Bias between methods was greater at high PEEP, and further increased when high PEEP was combined with low VT.
Percent agreements between methods were very high at each site (97.1 100%) and for all fusion transcripts (99.3 100%) (Table 4).
Correlations between methods were high (r = 0.84-0.92).
The correlation between methods was high (Table 4).
However, bias due to lack of between-method standardisation and high variability of measurement between methods is likely [ 101, 102].
The gap between the methods increases at higher false positive fractions concerning the average rank.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com