Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Tukey's HSD post-hoc test was used to examine whether differences between lines were significant.
Differences between lines were significant (P <0.05) for all characters studied.
Similar(58)
However, the 0.21 mm difference in LSM duct length between cured lines was significant (P = 0.03; Table 4).
The differential expression between calli of the different lines was significant for 35 genes.
The difference between scores for STAT1H and STAT1L cell lines was significant (Student's two-tailed t-test; p = 0.0007; Figure 1D).
When p < 0.05, differences between lines were considered significant.
Although the variation between lines was highly significant, indicating that the response to infection was heritable, there was also considerable variability within some lines.
Moreover, the most significant differences between lines were detected at anthesis, just as in the non-emasculated samples.
The least significant differences between lines were 3.71, 2.69, and 2.70 for NDF, IVDOM, and DNDF, respectively.
No significant differences between lines were observed in culm thickness under control conditions; however, culms became thicker under SF where stem diameter (shoot base) increased by a range of 10 45 % over those in nonflooded conditions (Table 3), and genotypes varied significantly in the extent of SF-induced culm thickening.
The reference line indicated on the chart (α = 0.05) distinguishes between significant and insignificant effects, such that any effect that extends beyond this reference line is significant [55].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com