Table 2 shows that the mean of d n/d s is somewhat higher in the D. simulans lineage, although the difference between lineages is not significant.
Interestingly, in comparison of evolutionary rate between pika and rabbit lineages we found that the differences of the evolutionary rate between these two lineages were significant, but the differences between rabbit and all other lineages were not significant.
Our univariate analysis taking cavitary TB as the outcome confirmed that the difference between MTBC lineages was not statistically significant.
In contrast, the Carpentarian Barrier – the boundary between genetic lineages – was not selected as an important predictor of plumage hue in any model.
The genotypic differences between the lineages are not eroded by a phase of "common environment" evolution, but, on the contrary, these differences seem to have been at the origin of additional differences.
Taken together, these findings indicate that, although HGT between the lineages was not completely random, no major "highways" [ 48] of intra-domain gene exchange existed in the history of archaea.
The divergence between these lineages is not large, with just three substitutions separating haplotypes from P. a. astriata and P. a. semicarinata, and with two and three substitutions separating both these subspecies from individuals from Fregate, where the three individuals sampled exhibit the same mtDNA haplotype.
The relationships between the eukaryotic lineages are not resolved.
In addition, relationships between L. rufescens lineages are not predictable by geographic location [ 32], which contrasts with the high spatial structure of populations in other Loxosceles species [ 31, 34].
"The separation between domestic and wild lineages is not always clear," Vila notes. .
