Results With both methods there was a highly significant association between the level of predicted risk and the incidence of cardiovascular events and of total deaths: up to three quarters of all cardiovascular events and two thirds of all deaths were reported among people classified as at high or very high risk with either method.
Hierarchical logistic regressions revealed a dose-response relationship between the level of predicted need and the likelihood of reporting professional and non-professional contacts, together with associations with socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, relationships, and financial circumstances), suicidal ideation, and attitudinal factors, but not geographical remoteness.
Kaplan Meier survival curves in patients at very low, low, medium, high, and very high cardiovascular risk according to both methods indicated a highly significant association between the level of predicted risk with both methods and the incidence of cardiovascular events (log rank test, P<0.001) (fig 2).
In COPD there was a significant association between level of FEV1percentt of predicted and self-reported as well as probable ischemic ECG-changes, and this association persisted for self-reported IHD also after adjustment for sex and age.
Alternatively, this dramatic difference in the level of predicted ID between the experimentally and automatically identified proteins could be due the bias of the existing identification techniques toward the ordered proteins.
We hypothesised that the self-rated scores for programme completion (DUNDRUM-3) and forensic recovery (DUNDRUM-4) would predict moves between levels of therapeutic security and conditional discharge with similar predictive accuracy to staff rated scores on the same scales.
The patient ratings did not predict moves between levels of therapeutic security or conditional discharge.
Self-rated scores for programme completion (DUNDRUM-3) and forensic recovery (DUNDRUM-4) did not predict moves between levels of therapeutic security or conditional discharge.
In a prospective naturalistic observational cohort study in a forensic hospital, we examined whether scores on the self-rated DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery scales or differences between clinician and patient ratings on the same scales (concordance) would predict moves between levels of therapeutic security and conditional discharge over the next twelve months.
As suggested in Li and Jiang, 2012, we also calculated the Pearson's correlation between the logarithm of predicted expression levels and the logarithm of exact expression levels.
