Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
No other significant differences between groups were shown for this questionnaire.
The comparisons of plasma leptin and estradiol levels between groups were shown in Table 2.
No clinically relevant differences in QoL between groups were shown using QLQ-C30.
In a recent meta-analysis contrasts between groups were shown to be significant for TCI/TPQ Harm avoidance but not for NEO Neuroticism [ 32].
No differences between groups were shown using QLQ-C30, but the FACIT-CCSQ highlighted that patients seemed more satisfied in the XELOX group than in the FOLFOX-6 group at certain time points.
By pairwise comparison of means between the two severity groups, at every time point, the differences between groups were shown to be significant at days 1 to 2 and 3 when monitoring mHLA-DR FCM) and at days 1 to 2, 3 and 7 for HLA-DRA(PCR).
Similar(54)
a comparison between groups is shown in Table 1.
Results of patient-based and lesion-based ROC curve analyses between groups are shown in Fig. 5.
Likewise, the number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups is shown in Table 4.
Single gene expression values and the comparison between groups are shown in supplementary Table S1.
The frequencies of the individual KIR genes/pseudogenes in the various subgroups within the mothers and infants, as well as the frequency comparisons between groups, are shown in supplementary Tables S1 and S2 respectively.
More suggestions(15)
between groups were observed
between groups were assessed
between groups were found
between groups were considered
between pHs were shown
between groups were made
between metabolites were shown
between specialties were shown
between diaminotriazines were shown
between variables were shown
between nodes were shown
between groups were derived
between compounds were shown
between groups were undertaken
between groups were analyzed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com