Commonalities and differences in interpretations between groups were observed.
In the DNMTP paradigm, a delay-dependent decline was apparent, but no differences between groups were observed.
No differences in ROM improvement between groups were observed (F=0.3, P=.72).
Statistically significant differences of biomechanical parameters between groups were observed at three skeletal sites with corresponding changes in tibial histomorphometry.
No differences between groups were observed.
Endotoxemia resulted in a marked increase in GFR, but no differences between groups were observed.
No significant differences between groups were observed in age, height, body weight, gestational week, and emergency CD rate.
In addition, significant differences between groups were observed in omissions, perseverations, and rotation for the BVRT memory task: DD committed more of those types of errors.
In the study of Ronnestad et al. [6], although no significant differences between groups were observed, the group of players who utilized combined approaches broadly improved their performance.
No statistically significant differences between groups were observed (one-way ANoVA for each epitope).
In contrast, no significant differences between groups were observed for classical eyeblink conditioning.
