Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(28)
The statistical differences between groups were estimated by one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and student's t-test using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Differences between groups were estimated using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan's multiple range tests.
Fold changes between groups were estimated by taking the averages of the metastasis/primary log ratios.
Differences between groups were estimated by the ANOVA test.
Differences between groups were estimated by Mann-Whitney test or χ2 statistics, as appropriate.
Differences in survival between groups were estimated by the log-rank (Mantel Cox) test.
Similar(32)
For each window the number of insertions in each class (early/late, forward strand/reverse strand, BCL2 transgenic/wild type) is counted and the likelihood of this distribution between groups is estimated using two-tailed Fisher's exact test.
The significance of differences between groups was estimated by Student's t-test and/or Spearman rank correlation analysis and repeated-measures ANOVA.
For continuous outcomes, the mean difference (95% CI) between groups was estimated using linear regression models.
The significance of differences between groups was estimated by Student's t-test and the χ test.
The significance of differences between groups was estimated by Student's t-test and χ2 test as appropriate.
More suggestions(17)
between groups were observed
between experiments were estimated
between subtypes were estimated
between strands were estimated
between individuals were estimated
between prefectures were estimated
between groups were declared
between ratios were estimated
between groups were analysed
between phylogroups were estimated
between groups were examined
between categories were estimated
between electrodes were estimated
between contigs were estimated
between variables were estimated
between measures were estimated
between groups were conducted
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com