Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Differences between groups were accepted as significant at 95% confidence level (p < 0.05).
Similar(57)
These sibling groups were accepted at p>0.8.
The hypothesis of homogeneity between the groups was accepted.
The group is accepting applications now for a January cohort.
Differences between groups were assessed using ANOVA.
Ratios between 1.9 to 2.1 were accepted.
P values of <0.05 were accepted as significant differences between groups.
Out of this group a total of 577 were accepted for the present study.
Efficiencies between 80 and 110% were accepted.
Of 187 children, 96 children were accepted as control group (C) and 91 children were accepted as chlorhexidine (CHX) group.
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups; two patients who had a lower score than controls were accepted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com