Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(43)
aDifference between groups was statistically significant at p ≤.01.
cDifference between groups was statistically significant at p <.01.
The difference between groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3b).
The difference in peak voltage relative activity between groups was statistically significant (P = 0.013).
When group 1 was compared with group 2, the relative peak voltage activity was 73.93 ± 18.88% and 41.14 ± 12.96%, respectively (Figure 3), and this difference between groups was statistically significant (P = 0.013).
The difference between groups was statistically significant in the 6th week, showing that functional treatment is superior to POP in terms of pain reduction in patients with lateral ankle sprains.
Similar(17)
bDifference between groups is statistically significant at p <.05.
When considering demographic (age, gender) and clinical (frequency of attacks, type of migraine) features, some differences between groups were statistically significant.
However, none of the differences between groups were statistically significant.
These differences between groups were statistically significant (P=0.002).
These differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.001).
More suggestions(19)
between clusters was statistically
between groups was significantly
between sexes was statistically
between bilayers was statistically
between facilities was statistically
between groups were statistically
between comparisons was statistically
between subgroups was statistically
between systems was statistically
between methods was statistically
between treatments was statistically
between genders was statistically
between patients was statistically
between studies was statistically
between cohorts was statistically
between arms was statistically
between means was statistically
between instruments was statistically
between shapes was statistically
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com