In the current example the null hypothesis would be expressed as, 'The administration of intravenous nitrate has no effect on mortality in AMI patients.' In hypothesis testing any observed differences between two (or more) groups are interpreted within the context of this null hypothesis.
Either significant or insignificant Friedman tests in both groups were interpreted as indicating no differences between groups, whereas a significant test in one together with an insignificant test in the other group as indicating a difference between groups.
Germination strategy groups were interpreted according to these responses, and the relation between these groups and different mire types was discussed.
Europeans are the omitted comparison group in each specification; thus, the coefficient on each other group is interpreted as the relative difference in mobility between that group and Europeans.
His talks with a multihull group were interpreted as indicative.
In contrast to other studies, 3 6 the patients with low health literacy in our study were slightly younger than the patients with adequate health literacy, although the difference between groups was small and should be interpreted with caution.
The amplification of more than one locus was suspected from the visual reading of the gels (a large gap between groups of alleles was interpreted as the presence of 2 different loci, Figure 2) and from the segregation of alleles in the mapping population (i.e. the presence of individuals with more than 4 bands, or individuals with 3 alleles from the same parent).
The small number of subjects in the IM group is a limitation; consequently the comparisons between groups should be interpreted with caution.
There were no statistically significant differences in outcome measures between treatment arms.Due to the small sample size, comparisons between groups must be interpreted with caution.
However, while differences between groups must be interpreted with caution given the small sample size, more patients with ACO reported wheezing and mucus or phlegm than patients with COPD (95% vs 70%), whereas more patients with COPD reported difficulty breathing, chest tightness, chest heaviness/pressure and tiredness, weakness and fatigue than patients with ACO (80 90% vs 60 70%).
