Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Furthermore, no differences in distribution of homocysteine were found between groups, showing the lack of difference of homocysteine between groups across the entire range of values (Figure 1).
Mean reaction time was different between groups, showing the typical slowing effect with age (PM: F 2,45) = 4.14, P < 0.05; DMS: F 2,45) = 8.92, P < 0.01).
Similar(58)
The probability of inhibition (PI) did not differ between groups showing that the tracking algorithm worked as expected (t = 0.8; df = 58; P = 0.4).
Next, we compared the codon usage pattern between the gene groups showing the lowest 20% and highest 20% expression level.
Comparison between groups showed that the affected fascicle lengths were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) than the unaffected side and the healthy group.
Differences in the bone volumetric measurement within a standardized condylar volume (BV/CV) between groups showed that the CFA + P-DEX TMJ and CFA + P-DEX tail groups had statistically less BV than the CFA alone or no-manipulation groups.
In the comparative analysis of ECF between groups (shown in Table 2), in the unadjusted model, the ABI group performed worse on global cognition (control =28.55±1.46 vs ABI=27.44±1.73; P=0.007).
Comparison between groups showed more intrusion of the cusp tips and root apices (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively, Table 2) with more retraction of the root apices (p < 0.05) of the central incisors in the AP-group.
The comparison between groups shows a significant decrease of Hd and Mi in favour of the most recently treated group (G2): p< 0.029 for Hd and Mi p< 0.053 for Mi (Fig. 2).
A t-test between groups showed a statistically significant difference in the average classification accuracy between PWP and PNP group (p = 0.0335) and between AB and PNP group (p = 0.0343), but no statistically significant difference between AB and PWP group (p = 0.808).
Sociodemographic and behavioural factors vary between the groups, showing that the comparison groups are not surprisingly capturing different parts of the general population.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com