Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Due to small n, comparisons between groups should be made with caution.
The following non-inferiority margin was set: following treatment, the lower bound of the 95%% confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between groups should be less than 10 LSAS-points.
Some plausible explanations concerning the divergence in clinical course between groups should be discussed.
Thus, any statistically significant differences between groups should be interpreted cautiously.
The small number of subjects in the IM group is a limitation; consequently the comparisons between groups should be interpreted with caution.
This would affect all groups equally and so, even though the estimated median would change, the effect on the comparisons between groups should be minimal.
Similar(53)
However, the fact that the hospital discharge curve between AT III and placebo was almost identical provides evidence that the comparison between treatment groups should be unbiased.
Collaboration between these groups should be promoted.
However, because all patients had access to the treatment considered to be optimal for them after the first year, no long-term differences between the groups should be expected.
Indeed, it has been demonstrated that the effects of the intramolecular non-bond interactions between solute groups should be reflected in the solvation free energy function to describe the solute-solvent interactions in a quantitative fashion [30 33].
Thus, the comparison between the groups should be valid.
More suggestions(15)
between domains should be
between atoms should be
between stations should be
between rooms should be
between rates should be
between subsystems should be
between strangers should be
between particles should be
between maps should be
between trials should be
between doses should be
between devices should be
between variables should be
between users should be
between tiers should be
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com