Sentence examples for between groups revealed a from inspiring English sources
Comparison between groups revealed a significant difference of the tactile condition only (U = 5.0, p = 0.01).
An analysis of the regression slopes between groups revealed a significant (F(1) = 7.33, P<0.01) interaction between the number of methylated CpG sites per clone for suicide subjects compared to controls.
Meanwhile, only comparison between groups revealed a significant difference.
The comparison between groups revealed a significantly higher gain for the EG than the CG, with respect to functional measures taken at both T1 and T2.
Cox regression analysis, which included variables with p < 0.1 between groups, revealed a statistically significant association only between albumin levels and mortality (Table 3).
By mass spectrometry, 34 plasma proteins were significantly different between groups, revealing a previously unappreciated altered baseline environment pre-MI when MMP-9 was deleted.
Planned contrasts between the groups revealed a significant difference between the primary antibody omitted control and both MRs and GR (t = 10.496; p<.0010.496
Post hoc pairwise comparisons between the groups revealed a significant difference between the shams and midbrain DA rats (P = 0.01), but not between any of the other pairs of groups (P > 0.05 in all cases).
In accordance with previous studies, direct comparisons between these groups revealed a tendency for patients and their parents of the first category to report more positive assessments in esthetic, functional, and everyday life parameters [ 11, 18].
Statistical comparisons between various groups revealed a trend for improved outcome for patients with non-adenocarcinoma histology, patients that received cisplatin-based chemotherapy and patients who underwent simple lobectomy.
A post-hoc statistical power calculation of the non-significant quantitative analyses of adverse events, using a risk of Type I error on 5% and the observed cumulated difference between treatment groups, revealed a statistical power of less than 50% on analyses of most adverse events in both abdominal and spinal surgery.
