Sentence examples for between groups must be from inspiring English sources

There were no statistically significant differences in outcome measures between treatment arms.Due to the small sample size, comparisons between groups must be interpreted with caution.

However, while differences between groups must be interpreted with caution given the small sample size, more patients with ACO reported wheezing and mucus or phlegm than patients with COPD (95% vs 70%), whereas more patients with COPD reported difficulty breathing, chest tightness, chest heaviness/pressure and tiredness, weakness and fatigue than patients with ACO (80 90% vs 60 70%).

However, this is a small non-randomised study and statistically significant differences between groups must be interpreted with caution.

The null hypothesis of no difference in distributions between groups must be rejected and examination of χ values shows that the major contributors to the differences resided in the controls and 14-day conditioned groups.

Given the evidence supporting the correlation between higher resting parasympathetic tone and higher aerobic fitness levels [ 51– 58], the potentially confounding influence of aerobic fitness levels between groups must be considered when interpreting our cardiovagal results.

As there is no consensus based agreement of how large a difference between groups must be to be of clinical importance it is impossible to conclude whether the effect found in our study is of clinical importance.

In this situation, any difference in outcome between the groups must be caused by the specific effects.

The registered difference in the mean age between the groups must be without significant influence on the perioperative blood loss.

If the number of appointments attended by users in Group A is lower than expected, the difference between the groups must be larger for us to detect it.

Nevertheless, these comparisons between patient groups must be made with caution as they may have been influenced by the patients' characteristics, severity of illness, co-morbidity, age and also the type of care given.

Differing resources between individuals and groups must be referenced (e.g., Becker 2012; Beicht and Walden 2015; Hadjar et al. 2010).