Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
In light of the differences observed between study groups in the indirect measures of efficacy, we would also expect more remarkable differences between groups in treatment outcomes related to pain and the ability to perform ADL.
Differences between groups in treatment did not influence the results.
We also found that perceived benefits of treatment were associated with treatment satisfaction/preference (6, 7) and accounted for most of the difference between groups in treatment satisfaction/preference (6).
To reduce the discrepancy between groups in treatment expectation and thus mitigate against the risk of triggering resentful demoralisation, we developed a comparison condition called "Depression Relapse Active Monitoring" (DRAM) as an alternative to a TAU-only control.
Similar(56)
Our finding showing that the malate dehydrogenase activity presented no statistically significant difference between groups in both treatments corroborates, at least in part, a literature report.
Fourth, between-group differences in treatment expectations and treatment credibility were not assessed at baseline, which supposes a significant threat to our study's internal validity.
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in treatment expectations (F 2, 122) = 1.47, P = 0.24) in the first treatment session.
There were no differences in treatment outcomes between groups in response to the treatment, given the lack of significant treatment x time interactions.
Patients in both groups showed improvement in PTSD symptoms, but no between-group differences in treatment response were observed and a high placebo response rate was found.
No statistically significant between-group differences in treatment emergent adverse events were observed during the 8 weeks of this study (Table 4).
There were no clinically important between-group differences in treatment-emergent changes in ocular safety assessments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com