Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
There were no significant differences between groups in depression- or in NSPhS-scores at baseline.
Similar(59)
There were also no significant differences between groups in improvement in depression, self-efficacy, fibromyalgia impact, or fibromyalgia knowledge.
Another potential limitation was that, while there was no significant between-group difference in depression severity, with both groups having mean depression scores in the severe range of the 25-HDRS (19– 22), UD had higher mean depression severity than BD.
There were no differences between groups in craving or depression.
There were no significant between-group differences in depression or A1C.
No difference was observed between groups in the incidence of depression, suicidal ideation, or hypoglycemia.
There were also no significant differences between groups in HADS anxiety and depression scores.
A similar model including the same covariates was used to analyze the differences between groups in the undertreatment of depression.
In men, the results showed significant differences in the changes between the intervention and control groups in depression (p = 0.017) and distress (p = 0.029) and marginally significant differences in usual activities (p = 0.058) and sexual activity (p = 0.051).
There were no significant differences between groups in level of distress, anxiety, depression, demographic or clinical features (p > 0.05).
Independent samples t-tests were used to evaluate differences between groups in terms of symptoms of depression, anxiety, global functioning and obsessive-compulsive drinking scores at the different time points.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com