Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
No significant differences were found between groups for overall LOS at baseline (p=.703).
Significant differences at 3 minutes between groups for overall movement, medial, superior, and lateral quadrants occurred.
There was also no difference between groups for overall mental health (DASS total score) at follow up.
Significant differences emerged at 3 minutes between groups for overall movement (P = 0.006), medial (P = 0.039), superior (P = 0.020), and lateral (P = 0.003) quadrants.
Similar(56)
Differences between groups for MHQ overall hand function score at 4 months, overall MHQ score at 4 and 12 months, measures of pain (sub-scale of MHQ and 'troublesomeness'), impairment measures, self-efficacy, joint counts, and quality of life (SF-12 and EQ-5D) scores will be analysed in a similar manner to the primary outcome measure.
Specifically, differences in the P300 component were explored across load level (low load and high load), location (positive probe i.e. in the same location as shown in the study stimulus and negative probe i.e. in a different location to the study stimulus) and between groups for the overall P300 timeframe.
Quality of life of carer and recipient of care There was no significant difference between the groups for overall quality of life for the family members with dementia.
At mid-term follow-up this review could not detect any significant differences between both groups for overall function evaluated by standard knee clinical scores in eight out of nine studies.
No significant differences were seen between the two groups for overall satisfaction (p = 0.546) and individual components of the questionnaire.
No significant differences were found between the two groups for overall survival (data not shown).
No significant differences were seen between the two groups for overall satisfaction (p = 0.546) and individual components of the questionnaire.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com