Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(2)
a Total porosity: no differences between groups are significant.
Because of the large sample size, even small differences between groups are significant, although they might not be clinically relevant.
Similar(58)
The difference in conceptions per woman between groups was significant (P =.036).
Differences in OD between groups were significant (P<0.01), although from 2.80 to 6.50 mm follicles, the oocytes were not different in size.
The difference between groups was significant (P < 0.001).
Control FH rats that did not have access to saccharin consumed 5.0 +/- 0.5 between groups was significant: p = 0.006).
The differences between groups were significant at the 2- and 6-month follow-ups (Table 4).
Differences between groups were significant only for VO2max (p=.0014) at 3 months with the aerobic-only group improving twice as much in aerobic capacity as the spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic group.
The overall difference between groups was significant (χ2 = 11.2, p = 0.01).
For the Kruskal-Wallis test, if the overall difference between groups was significant then post hoc analysis was performed using Dunn's test.
We performed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether differences in the means number of positive cells between groups were significant [64].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com