Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Significant differences between groups are indicated in bold.
Significant differences between groups are indicated by an asterisk with * = p <.05 and ** = p <.01.
Significant differences between groups are indicated with an asterisk (P < 0.05).
Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated by P-values of <0.05, <0.01, or <0.001.
Significant differences between groups are indicated by an asterisk with ** = p <.01.
Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups are indicated by lower case letters, where a6 m/o, b12 m/o, c18 m/o and d24 m/o.
Similar(50)
Significance between groups is indicated (*p < 0.05).
Fold difference and statistical significance (*p < 0.05) between groups is indicated in the bar graphs.
A difference in the rate of washout of Hg in blood or brain between groups was indicated by a significant regression coefficient for time-by-group interaction.
Bar graph shows total number of P14 cells in WT and Cd80/86 −/− mice, and fold difference and statistical significance (*p < 0.05) between groups is indicated.
Means within a group of three crude extracts of each sample with a different superscript letter (bee pollen extracts) or pair of letters (floral pollen extracts) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; One way ANOVA), whilst a significant difference between groups is indicated by * or **.
More suggestions(19)
between clusters are indicated
between groups are illustrated
between groups are performed
between groups are considered
between groups are described
between groups are given
between libraries are indicated
between variables are indicated
between groups are done
between ratings are indicated
between groups are emphasized
between bars are indicated
between groups are adjusted
between methods are indicated
between indicators are indicated
between groups are listed
between levels are indicated
between lines are indicated
between environments are indicated
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com