Exact(1)
The differences between groups are described as percentage deviations from the average of the non-treated control.
Similar(59)
Table 3 describes the grouping and numbers of participants, while the differences between the assessment criteria between groups is described in Table 4 below.
Differences between clinical groups are described as n-fold differences between the medians and were analysed using either the Mann–Whitney U test or, for the paired samples of dysfunctional PTT and FDLT, the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
The differences between the groups are described in light of what were common for all participants.
Values expressed as the mean ± SD and statistically significant differences between treatment groups are described in the figure legends.
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments, and statistically significant differences between treatment groups are described in the figure legends.
The results are expressed as the mean ± SD values, and statistically significant differences between treatment groups are described in the figure legends.
Cell counts are graphed as the mean ± SD values, and statistically significant differences between treatment groups are described in the figure legends.
The main outcomes to be sought for the engagement between the three stakeholder groups are described below in Fig. 2. Fig. 2 Three way stakeholder dialogue outcomes.
The demographic and laboratory characteristics between the favorable and poor outcome groups are described in Table 1.
These three object groups are described below.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com