Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
The only significant interaction between group and task was on the parameter CTx3, i.e. the canceling time for the high frequency band was longer in controls than in dyslexics for the SFT task only (p<0.05).
Furthermore, no interactions between group and task were found.
No interactions between group and task were found for the left ITG.
We found no interaction between group and task on connectivity of the left IFG.
Finally, we found an interaction between group and task on connectivity between left IPL and left postcentral gyrus.
Our whole-brain analysis found no interactions between group and task (silent reading, phonological lexical decision, and rest) on connectivity of the left FFG.
Similar(48)
The effects were compared between groups and task conditions using repeated measures ANOVAs and related to sex-hormone levels using multiple regression analyses.
Because precision in performing the task was similar between groups and tasks (see Figures 3B and 4B) a stimulus-specific aversion explanation for the data seems unlikely.
Error Rates (ERs) and Response Times (RTs) of each subject served as behavioral measures, and mean performance was compared between groups and tasks.
A significant interaction was found between group and postural task (P=.05), with reaction-time scores showing a progressive increase in postural task difficulty among participants who had suffered a stroke.
We also observed regions showing an interaction effect between subject group and task condition (see Table 2 and Figure 6).
More suggestions(15)
between group and measurement
between age and task
between group and round
between group and congruency
between group and portion
between neuroticism and task
between user and task
between game and task
between workload and task
between person and task
between wage and task
between treatment and task
between g and task
between group and latitude
between group and week
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com