Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
To investigate the dynamic trend of the nuchal translucency thickness between fetuses with normal and abnormal karyotype.
Similar(59)
Our study revealed no difference in fetal DNA levels and fetal DNA: maternal DNA ratio between the patients carrying Down syndrome and the controls carrying fetuses with normal karyotype.
Significant differences in methylation profiles were only present between fetuses with DS and fetuses with a normal karyotype, since the two groups with DS clustered closer than those with normal development and iCHD, even when chromosome 21 data was excluded from the analysis (Fig. 1C ).
The a-V and PIV of 11 fetuses with NT>95th percentile and cardiac defects were decreased and increased compared with the 25 fetuses with normal hearts, irrespective of the karyotype.
The purpose of this study was to compare the mitral valve tricuspid valve distance in second-trimester fetuses with normal cardiac anatomy versus those fetuses with endocardial cushion defects.
The mean (z score) of middle cerebral artery time-averaged mean velocity for fetuses with normal hemoglobin was 1.1 ± 0.81 and for the fetuses with anemia was 4.71 ± 2.16 (P <.001).
Further, we suggest that in utero stem cell transplantations in fetuses with normal immune development should be performed before the 13th week of gestation.
To evaluate the perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome of small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler managed expectantly during pregnancy and delivery.
The objective of the study was to evaluate echocardiographic markers of cardiac dysfunction in small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler.
We investigated fetal and total DNA levels in maternal plasma in patients bearing fetuses affected with Down syndrome in comparison to controls carrying fetuses with normal karyotype.
The remaining 6 fetuses with normal US showed CMV-negative brain and no histological damage (43%) (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com