Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We estimated the risk of prostate cancer incidence and mortality in relation to occupational physical activity by performing internal comparisons between exposure groups within the cohorts.
Similar(59)
All results of the stratified analyses will be presented as the cumulative risk differences with 95% CI between exposure groups and within strata of each effect-measure modifier.
25 Assessment methods did not differ between exposure groups.
SNI was not significantly different between exposure groups.
However, paternal smoking and alcohol consumption differed between exposure groups.
SI was not significantly different between exposure groups.
Hence, due to the relation between age and gender, stratification by age resulted in an uneven distribution of gender among the exposure groups within age strata.
Associations between exposure and outcome are assessed by statistical methods including specific modeling to account for correlated outcomes within families and differences in duration of follow-up between the exposure groups.
The results showed that, after 24 weeks of AFB1 exposure, there was no significant difference in final body weight between AFB1 exposure groups and the control group.
The method does not alter the relative risks but enables valid comparisons between any two exposure groups, even when neither group is the reference group.
As the statistical analyses were performed within exposure groups and not between them, the possibility of biased estimates is further reduced.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com