Sentence examples for between exposed and control from inspiring English sources
For example, the authors found statistically significant lower WBC, RBC, and platelet counts in exposed vs. control factory workers, yet they found no statistically significant difference between exposed and control subjects in relation to colony formation of myeloid progenitor cells (CFU-GM), which give rise to granulocytes and macrophages, cultured from blood.
Of these studies comparing exposed populations (defined by exposure or by occupational group), 4 showed significant deficits between exposed and control populations, 4 showed decrements in performance related to exposure, and 6 showed no decrements in performance.
The comparison between exposed and control samples revealed the maintenance of strength-related properties of geotextiles in the presence of microorganisms.
Experience-dependent changes during sleep were not significant in the hippocampus for Bdnf, Camk4, Creb1, and Nr4a1, and no differences were detected between exposed and control SWS groups for any of the genes tested.
The source strength waveforms were similar between exposed and control groups in the focused listening condition; however, they were different during distracted listening, especially in the BEN_1/4CB condition.
Recall that, Figures 2 and 4 represent displacement of effect sizes between exposed and control animals.
The major findings from the study were the significant difference between exposed and controls in red and white blood cell counts, although all measurements were in the normal clinical range and with the exposed group showing significantly increased frequencies of aneuploidy as reflected by monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 in metaphase spreads of cultured myeloid progenitor cells from peripheral blood.
The 19 differentially expressed cytokine genes were also identified in the global analysis, but only a few had p-values low enough to be listed in Tables 1 and 2. However, several had high ratios of differential expression between exposed and controls, with PBEF1, IFNGR1, and CXCL16 being increased around 100% (Table 3).
This deficiency has a substantial effect on the reported differences between exposed and controls, since FISH assays are subject to correction for background and sensitivity errors and due to statistical limitations inherent in scoring of FISH assays, a minimum of 200 cells are typically required in order to report a valid result in a clinical setting.
It is thus possible that WBC and RBC counts in peripheral blood are modulated by formaldehyde exposure in mechanisms involving extramedullary systems (i.e., outside the bone marrow); this would contribute to confounding in epidemiology studies that result in observed differences between exposed and controls.
