The big difference is between conventional explanations based on 'electrochemical pathways' – presumably neurons and nerve fibers – and electrodynamical fields.
Given that the concentrations are higher than those we found in our global study, which was conducted using the exact same protocols on free-ranging whales, one can rule out explanations based on between-study variation, such as differences in post-mortem decomposition.
Different explanations based on the relationship between firms' pricing decisions and capacity utilization support the hypothesis of (short-run) non-linearities when market slack is very low (e.g. Clark et al. 1996, for the US case).
Only explanations based on secondary contacts between snails of the B and C lineages could clarify the morphometric heterogeneity in space and time registered in Galician populations, in which adult snails exhibit B or C shell and genital features according to sampling dates (1991 and 2004 for E9, 2004 for E13) and location.
Our results do not support explanations based on a hypothetical attraction between septohippocampal and crossed perforant path fibers (which react in the same area) or on competition with commissural fibers (which reinnervate an adjacent area).
The similar performance for no and partial homology trials also rules out explanations based on facilitation or interference between purely sensory codes.
However, more parsimonious explanations based on impairments in basic recognition processes could also apply.
Two explanations, based on reaction mechanism, were proposed to explain this fact.
