Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(7)
The main intervention effect will be assessed on the basis of a comparison between exercisers and controls as defined at randomization, regardless of exercise adherence, i.e., according to intent-to-treat principle.
The main intervention effect will be assessed on the basis of a comparison between exercisers and controls as defined at randomization, regardless of exercise adherence, i.e. according to the intent-to-treat principle.
The main intervention effect will be assessed on the basis of a Cox-regression analysis between exercisers and controls (relaxation group) as defined at randomization, regardless of exercise adherence, i.e. according to the intent-to-treat principle.
There was no difference in improvement between exercisers and controls (p = 0.08 0.9).
There was no difference between exercisers and controls across 12 months for changes in glucose, IGF1, IGFBP3, IGF1/IGFBP3, or adiponectin.
No significant differences in the KOOS subscales assessing pain, other symptoms, or function in daily life or in sport and recreation were seen at any time point between exercisers and controls.
Similar(53)
Exercisers and controls were similar at baseline with respect to age, body composition, and proposed biomarker concentrations (Table 1).
Each batch had an equal number of samples from exercisers and controls with similar randomization dates and two pooled quality control samples.
Furthermore, we aimed to identify differences between exercisers and non-exercisers in BW and BF% change, in addition to identifying other parameters that might impact or predict BW and BF% changes.
Although using different validated PA questionnaires may have been more sensitive to detect differences between exercisers and non-exercisers, based on the very small differences between our groups, it appears more likely that these outcome variables simply do not differ between these groups.
Once disease severity reached a DSS ≥5, QoL was again similar between Exercisers and Non-exercisers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com