Sentence examples for between duplicate samples and from inspiring English sources

Genotyping accuracy was determined by the genotype concordance between duplicate samples and was 100%.

Data were accepted if there was< 10% variation between duplicate samples, and if not, we repeated the analysis.

The call rates for the genotyped SNPs were 97.8 99.2%, with >95% concordance between duplicate samples and there was no evidence of deviation from HWE (p > 0.05).

The call rates for rs9939609 and rs17782313 were 99.5 and 99.6%, respectively, with >95% concordance between duplicate samples and there was no evidence of deviation from HWE (P > 0.05).

We excluded SNPs from analysis if they failed one or more of the following thresholds: GenCall scores <0.25; overall call rates <95% minor allele frequency (MAF) ⩽0.01; outlying in terms of signal intensity or X : Y ratio; discordance between duplicate samples; and, for SNPs with evidence of association, and poor clustering on inspection of X : Y plots.

The measurements had good precision (<10% difference between duplicate samples) and high reproducibility (correlation coefficient between repeated measurements = 0.9 and a mean [SEM] coefficient of variance of 10.9%[2.4%%]) All assessments in the study (renal function, nitrosative stress, and biochemical profiles) were conducted blind to OSA status.

We also found a high correlation between duplicate samples for IFNγ and iNOS at all CpG sites tested.

Sample allocation on SAM 1 was designed to assess reproducibility between two separate total RNA extractions, between duplicate samples (technical replicates) and between two input RNA amounts.

In the fingerprint set, samples were excluded based on low sample call rate, sex errors, inconsistencies between duplicate samples, Mendelian errors, and erroneous IBS/IBD relationships.

Sample A (A) and sample B (B) from two patients both showed strong correlations between duplicate samples on different chips and different profiling day in discovery study (R 2 = 0.99), indicating that detectable miRNAs (after meeting quality control criteria) are experimentally consistent.

There was also strong agreement between duplicate samples (correlation coefficient R=0.975) and between independent operators reviewing the same digital images (correlation coefficient R=0.994).