Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Analysis of SUVmax values between dose groups on day 1 (c) and day 3 (d) of the treatment.
Similar(59)
The PET data were analyzed for significant differences between dose groups.
Release efficiency varied between dose groups.
Haematoma volume was comparable between dose groups.
No marked difference was found between dose groups.
Overall clinical response was similar between dose groups.
The difference between dose groups reached statistical significance between Group L and Group H and between Group M and Group H (Table 2).
Among these women, the risk was no different between dose groups or treatment indication groups.
There were no significant interactions between dose group and treatment strategy on bleeding or efficacy.Similar to observations in practice, despite guidelines recommendations and protocol guidance, 34% of EARLY ACS patients with reduced renal function failed to receive an appropriately adjusted study drug infusion.
There was no significant difference in SDHA level between different dose groups, and SDHA normalization did not affect the results obtained from original dataset.
There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency between the dose groups (placebo n=21, Low Dose n=16, Medium Dose n=17 and High Dose n=12).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com