No differences were observed in 15D measures between the different training groups (Table 4).
Variables found to be significantly different between the training groups will be considered in the final analyses, in addition to prespecified covariates (gender, age, and physical impairment).
Adherence to the prescribed 6-week intervention was not significantly different between the training groups (NMES 91.3%, RT 83.3%, P = 0.324).
There was no statistical significant difference between training groups.
The outcome of fall rates differed between the training groups; guided training was more effective than self-training.
No differences were found between the training groups.
Running performance differed 15.7% on average between training groups.
Performance during strength and exercise testing and fATP, intramyocellular lipids (IMCL), and hepatocellular lipids (HCL) also were not different between endurance and resistance training groups (Table 2).
In exploring the extent to which CDSS might improve the diagnostic capability of clinicians, the success rate varied between different groups with different training levels.
There was no difference between any of the training groups.
