Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Comparisons are reported with literature methods for predicting the measured parameters; discrepancies between data and predictions may be partly due to the inadequacy of a single "equivalent" diameter to represent both shape and size of non-spherical particles; predictive methods performing best are also identified.
The discrepancy between data and predictions remains unexplained and highlights a knowledge gap that requires further investigation.
A good agreement between data and predictions is achieved, indicating a reduction in fracture toughness by 30% due to sustained exposure to sea water.
Preliminary calculations with constant convective (liquid side) heat transfer coefficients show that the inclusion of an intrinsic dissociation kinetic model from the literature leads to a substantial mismatch between data and predictions.
In general, the differences between data and predictions are small.
After calibration, the relative differences between data and predictions are 38% on average (Additional file 1: Figure S3 shows an overall data vs. prediction plot for both in vitro PK and PD).
Similar(53)
Comparison between data and prediction over a range of jet velocity, temperature and angle of observation again show very acceptable agreement.
Comparison with the IRI-2012 model reveals discrepancies between data and prediction, that are especially prominent during the periods of very low solar activity.
Therefore, in agreement with table 4, the best match between data and prediction is obtained for the correct model.
Moreover, the sum of squared deviations between data and prediction was not significantly affected when a single k parameter was used for all three phosphatases.
The deviation of the model from experimental data was calculated from the sum of squared deviations between data and prediction (SS) provided by COPASI and from absolute deviations between fitted and experimental values.
More suggestions(12)
between data and data
between data and simulations
between data and algorithms
between data and interpretations
between data and metadata
between data and codewords
between measurements and predictions
between data and Eqs
between tests and predictions
between explanations and predictions
between observations and predictions
between data and synthetics
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com