Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
However, we were not able to confirm a statistical interaction between cue type and dosing condition in the object recognition task.
In the original regression analyses in [12] no differences were found between high and low tone cues, nor any interactions between cue type and other experimental factors; here, we therefore consider the trials cued by C1 and C2 as two separate (intermingled, but non-interacting) sequences.
The effect of cue type and the interaction between cue type and experience varied over time (Table 1).
Prey patch selection was affected by IG predator cue type and the interaction between cue type and experience but not experience as the main effect.
Pairwise post hoc comparisons of the interaction terms revealed that the significant interaction between cue type and experience was mainly due to a significant difference (LSD: P = 0.001) between naïve and experienced females in the choice situation with both IG predator cues, whereas experience did not have a significant effect in the other choice situations (Fig. 2).
Similar(55)
Our repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a two-way interaction between cue-type and map [F 1,13) = 9.664, p = 0.003].
Given the topographical differences that we observed between pro-cue and retro-cue trials, these interactions between cue-type and electrode position may have reflected primarily topographical differences.
The two-way interaction between cue-type and map only approached significance [F 1,13) = 3.673, p = 0.078]: the 'green' map was marginally more frequent than the 'red' map for pro-cue trials, and the 'red' map was marginally more frequent than the 'green' for retro-cue trials [ps = 0.078].
The females responded to each cue type but different behaviours were differently affected by cue type and experience.
As predicted, all participants named the word-cued items significantly faster than the noise-cued (F1 and F2 p < 0.001; Figure 1), with a mean difference between cue types of 158 ms and accuracy at ceiling for both (Table S2).
No three-way interaction between the two cue types and reward level was observed (F < 1).> -wrap-foot> The values in brackets represent the standard errors of the means.
More suggestions(17)
between cue reward and
between disturbance type and
between seizure type and
between cue valence and
between management type and
between room type and
between sample type and
between ownership type and
between learner type and
between drug type and
between cue probability and
between blood type and
between picture type and
between symbiont type and
between fracture type and
between item type and
between sponsor type and
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com