Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
A subgroup analysis demonstrated that the most significant difference between control and study groups was evident in novice paramedics (p = 0.014).
Macro and microscopic comparison of intrapulmonary surfactant deposition was examined between control and study group.
There was no statistically significant difference between control and study groups in terms of initial ISQ values (p > 0.05).
Histomorphometric analysis revealed statistically significant differences between control and study groups in the growth of new bone formation at 6 and 12 weeks.
Age data in primary studies was used to construct 95% confidence intervals in order to assess whether differences existed between control and study populations (NCSS 8, Kaysville, UT, USA).
Further, the change in cervical length at 1 and 24 hours did not differ significantly between control and study groups (Figure 2).
Similar(48)
Our results showed no differences in the percentage of CD4+ T cells-synthesizing IFN-γ between control and studied groups.
Moreover, in both T cell subsets no statistically significant changes in MFI of IL-4 expression were observed between control and studied groups.
Patients in both the study and the control group experienced improvements in Lysholm score, Tegener activity scale and VAS scores; there was no statistical difference between the control and study groups.
In contrast, in the present study there were no differences between the control and study groups.
Two studies had significant differences in age between their control and study populations.
More suggestions(15)
between sex and study
between baseline and study
between control and fat-1
between smoking and study
between control and control
between menopause and study
between control and surrender
between control and emblica
between control and vinclozolin
between diagnosis and study
between condition and study
between control and knockout
between year and study
between control and chaos
between homogeneity and study
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com