The focus of a process evaluation is not on testing differences between control and intervention group, but on the process of an intervention to increase the understanding of factors possibly affecting outcomes of an intervention.
Integrated control and process design (ICPD) practices focus on an interaction between process and control design.
A significant difference in body weight due to CMS process was also observed between control and CMS group.
This ability implies that the relationship between control processes and movement execution is not obligatory: the same movement may be guided implicitly or explicitly.
Interactions between cognitive control and affective processes, such as defensive reactivity, are intimately involved in healthy and unhealthy human development.
We tested the hypotheses that there are 2 distinct mechanisms of interaction between attentional control and reading processes (i.e., by replicating the behavioral observations of Balota and colleagues), and that the 2 mechanisms involve functionally and neuroanatomically separable attentional control systems.
Analyses were carried out in a two-stage process: first, overall differences between controls and treatments were considered and, if these were significant, then each compound was compared with its control in post-hoc testing.
This is supported by the similar viscosities between the unprocessed control and the processed xanthan observed at the end of the RVA heating process.
The interaction between topographic controls and hydrological processes is essential in defining hydrologic connectivity (Bracken and Croke, 2007; Turnbull et al., 2008), and to quantify the interaction, it is necessary to characterize these controls and processes.
Evaluating the potential of the P4 relationship is assessing the potential inherent interactions between the accreditation and measurement/reporting systems and the extent to which their effects could be expected to impact on the control and communication process between these two horizontal systems.
