Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
18 of 30 age comparisons between clusters were significant.
Similar(59)
With the exception of the sex variable, the values from the chi-square test indicated that the sociodemographic and behavioral differences between clusters were statistically significant.
However, the differentiation between clusters was highly significant, and low levels of differentiation a typical pattern for marine fish (Waples 1998; Hauser and Carvalho 2008)—does not necessarily reflect substantial ongoing gene flow.
This fact explains a significant lateral resistance when the distance between clusters is too large to enable quantum-mechanical tunneling.
Amount of stroma was always the lowest in cluster-1 and the highest in cluster-3; differences were significant between these two clusters in both, frozen samples (p < 0.001) and paraffins (p = 0.005).
Post hoc tests, Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons, revealed that the visual cluster had a higher median structural type than the fronto-limbic cluster (W = 255.0, z = 2.7, p = 0.0006, αcorr = 0.0008); all other pairwise differences in structural type between the four modality-specific clusters were not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.
The differences between all of the arms for calcification clusters were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Cluster 1 had the greatest PD and CAL; there were significant differences between the clusters for PD and CAL.
One-Way ANOVA with post-hoc tests showed that the differences between clusters on the three outcome items mostly were significant, varying from 11 of 15 significant differences for group 2 to 14 of 15 significant differences for the outlier group and cluster 5. aScored on a scale of 1 5, where 5 represents the best score.
Additionally, topographic correlations were considered significant only if clusters of ≥3 contiguous channels were significant at α=0.05 within cortical regions of significant difference between groups.
RST values between the admixture zone and both adjacent clusters were non-significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com