Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(4)
Exact(3)
The relationship between change in naming and change in conversation.
Despite the general lack of significant change in conversation, we did find a statistically significant relationship between change in naming and change in conversation for the two variables reflecting the intervention focus most closely (nouns per substantive turn and nouns/5 mins of conversation).
However, there was a significant relationship between change in naming and change in minimal turns/total turns (r = 0.57, p < 0.05, one-tailed), although as discussed above and shown in Table III, there is on average a big increase in score (of around half a standard deviation) between the two pre-therapy measures with a return to just below the first baseline after therapy.
Similar(57)
This paper investigates the relationship between change in picture naming with anomia therapy and changes in word retrieval in conversations between adults with aphasia and a regular conversational partner.
There was a significant relationship between change in picture naming after therapy and change in the two conversational measures incorporating nouns (number of nouns/5 mins of conversation, r = 0.50, p < 0.05, one-tailed and nouns/substantive turn, r = 0.56, p < 0.05, one-tailed).
The predicted correlation between change in content words per substantive turn in conversation and change in naming also did not occur.
Correlations between change in picture naming and in conversation were calculated for all the variables predicted to change with therapy.
A significant negative correlation was found between changes in confrontation naming and changes in metabolism in the precuneus.
A negative correlation was found between changes in confrontation naming and changes in metabolism in the precuneus.
The reason for the change in name was the new relationship between the executive and the Council.
There was a significant positive relationship between the change in picture naming and change in some conversation measures including the number of nouns produced in 5 min of conversation (r = 0.50, p < 0.05, one-tailed) and the number of nouns produced per substantive turn (r = 0.55, p < 0.05, one-tailed).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com