Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Concordance between both tests was assessed using the Kappa coefficient.
Concordance between both tests was assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.
The concordance between both tests was 96% (k = 0.48).
The difference in detection between both tests was not significant (p > 0.05) (Table 3).
QFT-G was conducted later in 65 subjects and median interval between both tests was 3 days.
The concordance between both tests was 96% (k = 0.48), mainly due to agreement on negative cases (Table 2).
Similar(53)
Good correspondence between the data obtained by both tests was found for the latter tag group, indicating that they are equivalent for the analysis of highly expressed sequences.
While the WISC-IV and WAIS-IV are not entirely comparable, the correlation for full scale IQ scores between both tests is 0.91.
Although concordances between both tests were relatively high, FTND test should be considered the best option for screening of nicotine dependence since it has a better performance on both sexes.
High correlations between both tests were observed, with 6 out of 114 being IHC-negative and SISH-positive, and 7 out of 114 being IHC-positive and SISH-negative.
"All the levels of mercury determined during both tests were between 100,000 to a million times less than the D.E.P. emission standard" for industry.
More suggestions(15)
between both values was
between both techniques was
between both areas was
between both results was
between both eyes was
between both genomes was
between both leaders was
between both countries was
between both parameters was
between both structures was
between both centres was
between both proteins was
between both electrodes was
between both approaches was
between both species was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com