Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
There are no prospective studies comparing outcomes between both techniques.
The comparison showed a very good agreement between both techniques.
In addition, there have been no studies about the biomechanical issues between both techniques.
This issue allows for direct comparison between both techniques and therefore for consistent quantitative mechanical measurements.
A number of discrepancies between both techniques were observed for the grouping of some Lactobacillus species.
Overall, the agreement between both techniques is good, though DORIS shows a significantly larger random scatter.
Moreover, correlations made between both techniques evidence similar results over a wide range of true strains.
Since the sample mass ratio between both techniques is approximately 3×104, and the speed of the cooling process may generate different morphologies, this phenomenon may be partially responsible for any discrepancy between both techniques for a specific polymer.
Bias and precision to each time point according to Bland and Altman demonstrated a good agreement between both techniques.
The results have been compared and validated with a conventional clinical immunofluorescence assay (ImmunoCAP test), confirming an excellent correlation between both techniques.
There was a strong correlation between both techniques, and the results showed that the real-time PCR assay should be useful for studies of the ecology of B. ostreae and its host parasite relationship.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com