Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Differences, correlation, and concordance between both methods were analyzed.
The differences found between both methods were lower than the uncertainty range of the standard calibration (<3%).
The interobserver accuracy and the agreement between both methods were measured by the coefficient of intraclass correlation (CIC) and a Bland-Altman plotting (BAP).
No significant differences of the fluorescent intensities of the different analytes between both methods were observed (Figure 4).
The statistical differences between both methods were obtained by analyzing 16 different plasma samples (pooled) and paired t-test was used for comparison between the mean values.
However, significant differences between both methods were also observed.
Similar(53)
The correlations between the results from both methods were found to be consistent with r = 0.9837.
Collection of A-ALC between both methods was similar.
A comparison between both methods is finally provided.
The agreement between both methods is excellent in a large range of temperatures.
On average a difference of 1.8 log units between both methods was observed for the predicted log Kaw values.
More suggestions(17)
between both methods was
between both groups were
between both units were
between both species were
between both catalysts were
between both strains were
between both parties were
between both factors were
between both scales were
between both cities were
between both designs were
between both races were
between both states were
between both plans were
between both countries were
between both genders were
between both variables were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com