Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The comparison between both methods gave excellent results, regardless of the tree species or size.
Similar(59)
However, both methods gave higher between- than within-home variances and suggested that single measurements could be used as proxies for average exposure during the year of sampling.
We expected a certain degree of variability between both methods, given the limitations of the normalization algorithms used prior to assessing fold change differences [57].
Nonetheless, both methods gave comparable results when we compared the acetylation coverage between the CFS and NCFS sequences as described below (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3C).
Both methods gave comparable results.
Both methods gave equivalent results.
Both methods gave identical results.
Both methods gave essentially the same results.
Both methods gave similar ranking of abundance, however.
Both methods gave similar results.
Both methods gave similar areas.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com