Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Table 7 compared the correlation between both methods for LOH analysis.
Ranges of 95% limits of agreement were calculated to assess agreement between both methods for individual patients.
Paired t-test was used to compare the RMSE and MAE between both methods for all experiments.
The lack of congruence between both methods for genes exhibiting low levels of variation (< 1.5 fold change) has been commonly reported [ 24].
The limits of agreement represent the range of values in which there is agreement between both methods for approximately 95% of the values [ 17].
Also a comparison of the methylation levels of individual CpG sites showed an excellent concordance between both methods for all loci under study.
Similar(45)
In turn, BYM provided practically the same point estimates for the risk of admission by area than the classical method, being the Pearson correlation between both methods of 0.99 for both genders, as expected given the large population size and frequency of the phenomenon studied.
This may explain the small differences in MRGlu between both methods, especially for the lung cancer study (study A).
Cohen's Kappa for the diagnostic agreement between both methods was moderate for lymphatic vessel invasion (Kappa = 0.433) and poor for blood vessel invasion (Kappa = 0.198) (Table 4).
On average a difference of 1.8 log units between both methods was observed for the predicted log Kaw values.
No significant differences were observed between both suture methods for load to failure (p = 0.45).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com