Sentence examples for between both methodologies is from inspiring English sources

Bland and Altman representations of these differences are shown in Fig.  2, showing a proportional error, i.e., the difference between both methodologies is higher when E′ values are higher.

The concordance between both methodologies was similar to that observed in other studies, varying from 85%to95.3%3% [ 24, 27, 34].

The difference between these methodologies is whether or not a slip of each segment depends on total rupture length.

The major difference between the two methodologies is how the residuals between the true function value and the polynomial surface approximation value at a design point are treated.

Thus, the difference in sensitivity between the two methodologies is still confirmed.

A compromise between these two methodologies is represented by the use of data assimilation scheme to include sparse remote estimates of surface fluxes into continuous modelling.

Another key differentiator between the two methodologies is that Data-at-Rest technologies can shift the responsibility for managing discovery and remediation efforts from the IT staff to individual data owners.

ComplOverlap approved three images less using G T 1, and two images less using G T 2. However, the consistency between the two methodologies is still verifiable with these results, given that, again, the divergence between the methods was small three and two images, respectively.

The most important distinction between participatory research and other research methodologies is the location of power at the various stages of the research process [ 46].

The comparison between results obtained from two types of methodologies is summarized in Table  2.

Far from a consensus having established itself over the last two millennia, the relationships between these methodologies are the subject of increasing debate today.