Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
No consistent histological differences between both groups were observed.
In addition, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U-test) between both groups were found in relative power of theta band.
Clinical features between both groups were compared by descriptive statistics.
Differences between both groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
However, no significant differences in clinical and microbiological outcomes between both groups were found.
Most variables between both groups were comparable except cerebrospinal fluid glucose/plasma glucose.
Therefore, partial measurement invariance across the elementary school and the middle school sample was established, and differences in the latent means between both groups were subsequently computed.
After therapy, withdrawal tumor growth rates still differed; however, at the end of the study at day 40, the tumor sizes between both groups were comparable again, indicating an increased tumor growth rate in the treated group (tumor growth flare).
The differences in glucose consumption between both groups were mostly related to changes in pyruvate contents, and samples cultured at 37, 40, and 43 °C exhibited the highest levels of pyruvate production at 36 h (Fig. 2c).
As in Mo7e cells, differences between both groups were significant, both in untreated and in MMC-treated cells (Figure 1b).
The differences of immunoblot band intensities between both groups were analyzed by student's t-test using SPSS software (version 13.0).
More suggestions(17)
between both units were
between both species were
between both catalysts were
between both strains were
between both factors were
between both scales were
between both designs were
between both cities were
between both races were
between both states were
between both genders were
between both countries were
between both plans were
between both variables were
between both authors were
between both coatings were
between both connectors were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com