Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(57)
In regard to the duration of the PR and the QT intervals, neither a distinct increase nor a clear difference between both groups was observable.
Similarly, the potential of the survived oocytes to develop up to good quality blastocysts after parthenogenetic activation between both groups was statistically equivalent.
The bias between both groups was 2.7 with a precision of 5.5 (LA, -8.0 to 13.5).
Comparison of nominal variables between both groups was done with a 2x2 cross table and the Fisher's exact test.
A significant difference in the distribution of the triage categories between both groups was not found (p = 0.305).
According to Bridwell criteria [14], interbody fusion rate of Grade I between both groups was nearly the same (MIS 85.7%, open 80%, P = 0.943).
Besides, we also collected information on the quality of relations between transhumant herders and farmers by asking people if the quality of the current relation between both groups was good, average, indifferent or bad.
As for specific IFN-γ secretion, difference between both groups was only observed for the schizont extract and was significantly higher in Pf/Sh-group compared to Pf-group (p = 0.02).
The difference between both groups was not statistically significant.
Similar(2)
According to the author, the difference between both groups was statistically significant (P = 0.04).
The difference in incorrectly classified photos between both groups was 61.3 % (CI 57.5%% – 65.0 %).
More suggestions(17)
between both populations was
between both groups become
between both series was
between both spheres was
between both methods was
between both values was
between both groups were
between both techniques was
between both areas was
between both bonds was
between both datasets was
between both ecosystems was
between both countries was
between both parameters was
between both structures was
between both centres was
between both lungs was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com