Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
There were no statistically significant differences between both groups for other blood gas parameters.
In these open play situations, no differences were found between both groups for the determination of the technical decision.
In these corner kick situations, no differences were found between both groups for the determination of the disciplinary decision.
No significant differences were observed between both groups for the time spent fixating the contact zone and non-contact zone of the defender.
No significant difference was found between both groups for gender (females: 43 of the respondents vs. 23 of the non-respondents, p = 0.43), age (mean 36±1212 vs. 33 ±12, p = 0.24), anti-epileptic medication, and seizure type or frequency (data not shown).
These results show a clear differentiation between both groups for both learning modes.
Similar(36)
There was no significant difference between females in both groups for all three formant frequencies.
The estimated differences for NBA3+ between both groups of sows are 1.09 ± 0.54 piglets (P < 0.046).
Table 5 shows the differences between both groups, both for the bootstrapped mean costs and the mean costs.
The highest difference between both groups was for the average iAMR, which was 47% lower in states with less permissive legislation, for analyses by residence and occurrence.
The percentage of patients who experienced any adverse event, during this study did not differ between both groups (32%and37%7% for SBCG1 and SBCG2, respectively).
More suggestions(15)
between both observers for
between both components for
between both periods for
between both markers for
between both acquisitions for
between both sides for
between both parents for
between both factors for
between both iDevices for
between both drugs for
between both analyses for
between both poles for
between both techniques for
between both experts for
between both modes for
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com