Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
This technical features, notably the need for loading the epiglottis or not, could explain in part the difference between both devices regarding ETI performance such as handling and the risk of adverse events or injuries.
Similar(58)
There was a good correlation between the two devices regarding CO and GEDV, but VolumeView showed higher GEDV than PiCCO.
One of the main reasons for the deficiencies in identifying inferior products is the difference in methodological requirements between pharmaceutical and medical devices regarding clinical studies, which serve as a basis for decisions.
There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the demographic data.
However, Teh et al. [21] found differences between both groups regarding severity.
There was high agreement between both scales regarding severity (83.1%).
Once the SIP session has been established, a dialogue between both devices is possible.
These tests were addressed to establish a baseline comparison between both devices.
Significant differences between both devices (p<0.05) were marked with #.
Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 show maps of the topographic correlation between both devices.
The differences of the AUCs between both devices were tested by the DeLong method (Table 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com